Articles

There is no longer anything stealthy about the war currently being waged against our class.  Truss the clueless has gone and the gloves are off.  The extremists are taking control.

Outrageous figures concerning interest rate usury, income attack inflation, and debt enslavement are flying around all over the place. We don’t want to compete with the bourgeois press in simple reportage. We are commenting instead as revolutionists on the class nature of this assault.

The headline rate of inflation may have just topped 10%, but the inflation rate of staples for our survival, cereals, bread, pasta, dairy produce and vegetables etc. is already nearly double that.  And that’s not counting heating, finance and housing costs.  

The government is attacking our resistance on two fronts. One, by the lie that strikers are selfish by risking fuelling wage driven inflation. Two, by planning urgent legislation to limit our ability to fight back, using the traditional excuse of protecting ‘the public’.  Fear and force are being deployed against us.  We must prepare to respond in kind.

Wage fuelled inflation by a greedy minority with too much power threatening the well-being of the rest of ‘us’, has been peddled since the beginning of the year.  There is no evidence of this wage driven inflation and even experts on the government side are having to concede this.  

Price rises are being driven by falling margins of profit due to war, preventable global pandemics, climate crisis and the fundamental contradictions in the logic of capital.  The collapse of neoliberal globalisation.  

In making our class pay for their avarice they are in a sense partly telling the truth:  Our crisis is being driven by a greedy minority with too much power, threatening the well-being of the rest of us, THEM.

On the back of this plan they are clearly hoping to confine wage settlements to around 5% at most. This even in the current circumstances will amount to a real term cut of 10% minimum to workers and producers across all sectors. They talk of growth but the only growth is in absolute poverty, food banks and desperation.

The chaos we see in government is them working at desperately increasing speed to gather and unite their forces to win this battle. Tumbleweed Truss was always expendable, capitalism’s Horsemen of the Apocalypse (which includes the Labour Party who won’t dismount to join a picket but will police the frontier of austerity), are not, and that’s why she is yesterday’s toast.

Full employment and poverty wages have left our struggle weaker than it should be and they know it. They will try and divide, the worthy and deserving against the greedy and the militants. The strikers against the ‘public’.  A common cause against war and chaos.

Their miscalculation lies here. As they will argue austerity is our saviour, they will see that the striker and the public are the same. As they argue our resistance is a minority ideological class war, we will increasingly see that the majority will recognise it’s solidarity in shared struggle as more natural than their State and its ambition on behalf of the ruling class minority.  Our forces must unite in equal clarity and determination 

As the famous anarchist philosopher Noam Chomsky puts it: “Austerity is just a fancy word for Class War”.  This is becoming the obvious in intent and consequence.  Strike ballots and actions, official or otherwise are happening everywhere.   Coordinating this activity is now the recognised common sense and being planned in.  

Their gloves are off, our boots must be on.  The ambition of resistance so far has been too limited.  They won’t concede because they can’t concede without threatening their security in power.  Their demands are unacceptable to our class. We must escalate our struggle, our actions, our coordination and our demands, to the point where it is equally unacceptable to them. Where it is their system, not our communities in peril. 

Then is where our boots must triumph over their gloveless hands. 

Article by Dreyfus

The capacity to wage war is a measure of the weakness of the working class, or its defeat.  National patriotism, the identification with the interests of the local branch of the ruling elites rather than with the working class internationally, is a surrogate marker for that defeat.  Despite an encouraging rise in militancy in response to the economic crisis, few would argue that national patriotism anywhere in Europe is currently in decline.  So we begin to oppose war from this position of weakness. 

What then do revolutionists do? Abandon revolutionary positions in equal measure? Or hold out the maximalist banner so it doesn’t sink beneath the bourgeois wave of manipulation of sentiment and militarisation?  For us as anarchist communists today this is necessarily where we must start – even from the pinnacle of retreat we say that this is what victory for our class looks like:  No to war; No to this war, no war but the class war!

Revolutionary Defeatism is a primary principle for internationalists.  Acting locally and coordinating globally against imperialist war is the internationalist task and responsibility of social revolutionary militants and our class everywhere.  But what does it mean?  The term coined in the first world war in 1915 was a response to the capitulation and collapse of the Social Democratic (Second International) movement in the face of national chauvinism and defending their own nation states, despite their pre-war commitment to class unity and resistance.

Even some of the greatest revolutionaries struggled to be truly internationalist in conflict.  Some favoured conditional support for their participants as a ‘defencist’ need to resist the greater ‘evil’ of the other side, be that for Kropotkin, Prussian militarism, or for most of the German left, Slav autocratic barbarism.  In much of Western Europe (including the Labour Party) against both, in favour of the ‘progressive’ gains of democracy. 

Internationalists recognised the global conflict remained between our class and that of the ruling class squabbling to defend their respective capitalist empires. Initially as tiny persecuted minorities they were the clarion call in the wilderness.

The principle is once again being questioned in the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and for similar reasons, sadly even by some claiming to be revolutionary internationalists.  Is there a bad side and a less bad side? Blatantly, but of no more significance to our view of the state than good cops and bad cops change our view on the police.

Russia’s tyranny and war crimes are increasingly well documented, often from the mouths of Russians themselves.  Recently The New York Times published Russian soldier’s letters home, one reading “Mum, there are bodies everywhere this is messed up.  They said it was a training exercise but they have told us to kill everyone. They lied to us – Putin is a fool”.  Should we not be arguing that Russian workers are being exploited and manipulated to kill their Ukrainian brothers and sisters? 

An article at the beginning of the conflict criticising ‘no war but the class war’ as “…not a very useful slogan.” argued that “The Ukrainian worker has made his or her decision, maybe to get out, maybe to stay and fight.” This misses the fundamental point, conned or coerced is not a choice.  The mitigation of ‘territorial defence’ doesn’t alter the fact that Ukraine now is an armed detention camp for 10,000,000 men aged 18-60. 

In 2018 Ukraine was labeled “Partly Free” by human rights organizations such as Freedom House. The 2014 Human Rights report accused It of not fully respecting diversity and excessively restricting media freedoms whilst being equally culpable in the violation of the laws of war in the Donbas – a conflict costing 14,000 lives.  In terms of good versus bad, it’s ‘Tuppence Ha’penny looking down on Tuppence’.

What makes the concept of defeatism so challenging?  For some it is a misunderstanding of the nature and importance of this as an Internationalist position; for others on the left, they are on the liberal wing of capitalist democracy and simply take sides, but for most it is the instinctive moral drive to tell good from bad leaving them open to the power of state propaganda.

The horror of war projected from afar inevitably produces waves of anger, sympathy, compassion, and a sense of helplessness which is itself exploited by our bosses and their states to channel any possible awakening resistance into the dead end of charity.   They manipulate us into false partisan choices in favour of one belligerent or the other. 

This is the true fog of war seeking to blind us from the what should be the obvious – The bosses on both sides are our enemy as the workers of both suffer and die awaiting our class solidarity in action.

Defeatism is not pacifism, it cannot afford to be whilst each rolling tank and falling bomb dismembers workers.  It is not, as Lenin described it, merely to “..desire the defeat of ‘your own’ government, wish defeat, favour nothing less than defeat” ushering in the victory of the most militarised and brutal power. 

Taking sides is the intuitive and easiest path to take.  We are taught from birth to do it and we inevitably draw on a nationalist instinct of the righteousness of our side when we do.  Whilst defeatism is not pacifist, neither is it neutral – we name the side ignored in the slaughter, our class on both sides and highlight that a capitalist peace is a defeat for our class and opens the road to the next war.

Revolutionary Defeatism is the active mobilisation of solidarity and defence of community against it’s forced militarisation and cooption, and resistance to the idea of a capitalist victory or a capitalist peace – the latter the bloody breathing space between blows. This includes blowing away the fog to see revolutionary defeatism in action.  In Ukraine and Russia, revolutionary comrades continue to recognise this as a conflict on the fault lines of global capital.  They continue to work together opposing nationalist propaganda, coercion and militarisation naming the conflict for what it is, an attack on our class.

Defeatism is not passive.  Makhno didn’t encourage passivity in the face of the Austro-German occupation.  Anarchists fought in Spain but neither for the monarchy nor the republic while more recently internationalists in northern Syria, whatever the subsequent compromise and decline from an imperialist imposed truce, fought not for state or caliphate, but for the Bookchinist experiment egalitarian (democratic) confederalism.  Defend yourselves, defend your communities but not your bosses or their state.  Organise for a revolutionary outcome.

Here we must hammer this message home, not just opposing the war but taking up our own class struggles enthusiastically refusing social peace and linking them in solidarity with our comrades in the global resistance.  Strikes are happening everywhere – soon will follow the accusations of ‘the enemy within’ and traitors.  Let them be right!  Class War IS the peace movement, the war against all wars.  There is no other non-binary solution, defeatism demands a single outcome, war or revolution!  Our choice is unequivocally clear!

Article by Dreyfus

“Together Forever” is no longer just a pop song, but the title of Moscow’s celebration of its annexation of the four eastern provinces of Ukraine.  This single act has locked in the intractability of its conflict with the West.

Before the invasion, it already controlled most of Ukraine’s coal through is satellite statelets in the Donbass region (accepted de facto in the Minsk Accord stalemate), and most of Ukraine’s Black Sea oil following its annexation of Crimea (not recognised but largely unchallenged).

The annexed territories amount to 15% of the recognised territory of Ukraine, though barely register a percentage as part of Russia as a whole.  So why has Russia decided that this is the hill to die on?

From a purely military point of view it might look like there simply was no coherent ‘Plan B’ following the rout at Kyiv of its much-vaunted military machine.  This seemed as good a corner as any to be painted into. It has an additional value of allowing conscripts to be deployed on new  ‘Russian’ territory and throwing a ‘spanner in the works’  as neither NATO nor the EU will accept an accession state with an active border dispute.

 At it’s heart though, the annexation is a desperate and, for Putin, irreversible move born out of real existential threat to Russian capital.

The collapse of the USSR as a global superpower and Russia’s relative lack of development since has led to it being caricatured as a giant nuclear armed petrol station.  The parody though reveals a lot.  The total economy is around the size of Italy’s, okay, but not that significant. In fossil fuels however, it is a colossus. 

With little else going for it other than its military power, and the world appearing to be moving towards dropping hydrocarbons within the next generation, Russia has few places to go.  It is a giant facing extinction.

The driver of the next industrial revolution is climate change and essential to achieving that is access to rare earth minerals and metals such as iridium. lithium, terbium, europium et al.  From the 1960’s their value was mainly gadget-based, colour TVs, computers, mobile phones et cetera.  Now they are essential for electronic engines, satellites, power storage, electronic batteries and other clean power technologies – hydrocarbon free mid-21st century capitalist planning.

Despite their name, they are not ‘rare’, just often inaccessible, complex to mine, and often toxic.  90% of the world’s production currently takes place in China. Putin knows what this means. China already sees Russia as week and future pickings.  The glimpses of dependence are already emerging. 

The European Union also sees the danger and in 2019 contracted with, amongst others, Ukraine for access to its vast resources of these elements.  According to a specialist advisor quoted in the Financial Times: “Ukraine has deposits of 117 of the 120 most widely used minerals and metals. At least 40 of them are needed for the green transition. It is a resource superpower.”

Ukraine sits on an estimated $15 trillion worth of rare earth elements, most of which are in the east, and half of which Russia now controls.  Neither Russia nor the EU will be prepared to compromise when the future wealth and profit of their capitalist heartlands are so invested.

Many, including some who think of themselves as revolutionaries, have struggled to understand our opposition to both sides, summed up in the internationalist revolutionary position of ‘no war but the class war’, instead myopically seeing it in moral terms: David versus Goliath, imperialism versus national liberation, good versus evil. 

This is of little help to the ordinary people like us, the workers and producers on both sides whose lives are being squandered because Ukrainian oligarchs want to sell their stolen riches to the west and Russian oligarchs want to steal the riches for themselves.

The suffering is obviously real, the war barbarous, the tragedy is the continuing slaughter of our class who only have their labour and their lives, neither owning, controlling, directing nor benefiting from the wealth they are being conned or coerced into dying for. 

It hasn’t stopped being capitalist exploitation by virtue of its distance. This is the way we need to see through the moral mist to the class reality.  This is a bosses war over resources for their future profiteering. 

Our side is our class, at home and abroad. This is what we mean by No War But The Class War!

By Dreyfus

“We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.” Aesop

Coordinated strike plans will result in over 165,000 workers from Aslef, the RMT, Royal Mail and the Felixstowe and Liverpool docks being on strike together on the 1st October.  The staggered and rolling strikes commence on September 30th with the members of the Communication Worker’s Union. 

The miss-judged truce for a dead queen is over and not a moment too soon!  They took no time out.  Behind the charade they planned and plotted their next assault on us and unleashed it’s  brutality in the budget of September 23rd! 

Billions for business and the rich that has crashed the pound, accelerating the rising price of food, fuel, heating, travel and nearly destroying national pension funds.  Saved at the last minute by the government’s bank buying £65 billion of the government’s own debt for us to repay with interest at a later date!

Yet still they make the unbelievable claim that soaring inflation is driven by workers wages which have yet to be satisfied by any account.  And the pressure on workers is growing on every side. Rising interest rates are not only going to make people with mortgages unable to afford their indebted homes but will reverberate through the rental system, making already overcharged tenants unable to sustain a roof over their heads.  Increasing personal debt just to eat and heat adds more links to our chains.

The crisis is deepening, and whatever we couldn’t afford a week ago we can afford still less now. The strikes are timely and will draw anger and support from our class.

While the Loyal Labour Opposition play for power by refusing to join picket lines and offering us a ‘fairer greener future’, we scream for action and resolution now! 

For the coordination of the strike action, for more and extended strikes, for the escalation of action, for connectivity of solidarity and engagement across communities, industries, trades, employed and unemployed! 

Forward to a real Red October!

By Dreyfus

Our new pamphlet is available at £2 plus postage:

 “You can’t blow up a social relationship!”  A new pamphlet published by the AnarCom Network

Capitalist crisis is again asserting itself across the globe with increasing ferocity and violence – superpower conflict, global hunger, fuel crisis, inflation, climate crisis and ecological collapse.

The charade of social peace between classes is unsustainable. Everywhere our class is forced to face an increasingly binary choice: life or death, war or revolution.

Anarchist Communism is faced with a fundamental paradox. That paradox centres on it’s relationship to the conceptual use of violence. Far from being violent, we are drawn to revolution by the need and passion to abolish a system so violent that it kills millions every day through indifference, neglect or design.

New edition of our newsletter Rebel Rose (8 page special) is available now – Free but a donation to postage is always welcome

“Comrades, know that the darkest hour is before dawn. Do not give up, no matter how hard it is! In the past behind us are generations and generations of anarchists who, through their own struggle, brought us to this moment. And in the future, generations and generations of anarchists are looking at us with hope.

We cannot let them down.

If not us, who? If not now, when?

Viva la anarchia!”

Message from the Anarcho-Communist Combat Organisation (BOAK) in Russia who are heroically sabotaging rail lines supplying ammunition to the Putin regime’s war efforts.

Via a Comrade Nick H

There is little point us giving a detailed breakdown of the recent ‘Fiscal Event’ as the bourgeois media is totally on it, and fair to say as aghast as everyone else! Government debt costs rise and currency falls as global capital mocks Truss’s policy time machine. 

A meme doing the rounds says: ‘I’d tell you a joke about trickle-down economics, but 99% of you won’t get it’.  The detail is secondary to the logic and the impact. 

Liz Truss explained during interviews at the UN that allowing the wealthy of The City to get richer and lifting the cap on bankers’ bonuses was essential to the levelling up agenda!!  Liz engages in a Thatcher Cosplay to resurrect a neoliberal model that even most capitalists have turned their backs on since it crashed and burned in 2008. 

For all the bells and whistles (including Putin’s trick of calling something blatant by a different name), the first detailed impact analysis by the Resolution Foundation says that the only net beneficiaries will be those earning in excess of £150,000.  The idea that they will all spend their money in Poundland and Pizza Hut creating more well-paid jobs for the rest of us is, well, laughable or tragic. 

Even western capitalism’s CEO Joe Biden chipped in with: “I am sick and tired of trickle-down economics. It has never worked.”  Ironic given that the US inspired bloody coup against the elected socialist government of Salvador Allende in 1973 turned Pinochet’s dictatorial Chile into an economic laboratory for the neoliberal ideas of Milton Friedman’s Chicago School. 

Reagan then Thatcher ran with its powerful anti-working-class agenda and the rest is history.  A history of attacks on the working class, it’s communities and social cohesion and deregulated land grab that trashed the planet. 

The optics couldn’t be worse, this is a robber baron’s budget for the rich from newly converted monarchist Liz Truss marking her out as a vicious class enemy – in case we didn’t know. 

Against the back drop of mass impoverishment and mounting class struggle this should prove the red rag for the enraged proletarian bull! The dead queen’s truce is over, it provided the smokescreen for this planned attack on any sense of decency, logic, and our class. 

Buried with intent in its detail, as if anticipating our response are further planned restrictions of the already highly regulated right to strike.  Our labour is our only possession and the class war, like Putin’s, has unmasked and come out in the open.

The struggle not only continues – it just escalated.

Article by Dreyfus

Putin’s bluff is called and the mask of ‘special’ has fallen away from the operational war being engaged in Ukraine.  Russia had thought that Ukraine was the capital asset up for grabs to be wrestled from the West.

Events at the Sino-Eurasian summit in Uzbekistan mid-September showed that Putin’s failures have put Russian capital on the menu too.  Putin is now that most dangerous beast, a tyrant in a hurry. 

As Russia desperately announces referenda and partial mobilisation to stay in control through a strategy of momentum, we risk the tragedy of ‘the beginning’ being a side show by comparison.  Bluff though is exposed and war it unambiguously is.

Resistance to the call up has been nationwide, visible and significant despite statewide repression and severe penalties.  Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov confirmed that some protesters are being punished by being issued with, and forced to sign on camera, call up papers in detention and released to report for active service. 

Peskov’s son was pranked by a satirical pro-war radio station pretending to be a recruitment centre issuing him his call-up papers – he explained whose son he was and that he would  “obviously not” serve in the Ukraine.  Another bluff called!  Dying for the rich and their state is for the poor.  Conscription, like the war, is being deployed as an active attack on our class! 

Around 1500 have so far been arrested protesting, as flights out of the country to the few available visa free destinations sell out.  500,000 Russians have left since March though borders are now slamming shut.  Many men trying to leave are being examined for eligibility for enlistment and turned back or detained. 

The state claims this call up is limited, only applicable to active reservists and military specialisms.  The signed legislation however contains no such stipulation and regions will be required to fill quotas. 

The now published in exile opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta alleges that the stipulated target of 300,000 is again a bluff, hiding a classified target in the legislation of 1 million.  Whoever had their head in the sand before Putin’s conscription speech is wide awake now leaving him with few cards left to play. 

The West has been well ahead in its war planning.  No military eligible male between the ages of 18-60 has been allowed to leave Ukraine since February 24th.  It’s target of a million workers in uniform to defend millionaire Zelensky’s oligarchs is already met.  With NATO’s arms depots pouring in, the results are showing too. 

Putin’s last gambit is claiming the brutally occupied eastern Ukraine as sovereign Russian territory following rigged plebiscites and annexation.  The new military intake won’t be deployable until spring, following a pause in offensives during the winter freeze.  In the interim Putin again rattles his nuclear saber. 

Western capital’s brinkmanship claim’s the threat it real, though survivable.  NATO’s retired General Petraeus claims the alliance “wouldn’t even have to resort to nuclear weapons, we could simply take out any Russian force of size or substance in Ukraine”. 

Both sides are fudging their way to nuclear showdown as capitalisms rival blocs paint each other into a corner.  The fallout could be more radioactive than riches galore for either side. 

We, the working class and the collateral or intended damage of their fight over resources don’t have bunkers.  We only have our labour and our solidarity. 

Resistance to militarisation abroad and class struggle at home are our necessary weapons against the existential threat of mass destruction.  As a popular social media meme puts it: “whatever things you think good Germans should have been doing in 1933, start doing them now!”.  Solidarity with the war resisters!  Oppose war abroad and escalate the class struggle at home!  No war but the class war – by any means necessary!

Article by Dreyfus

The Iranian Islamist theocracy is rightly in trouble, due to the tragic murder of Mahsa Amini by the Islamist morality police. Mahsa travelled to Tehran from the Kurdish part of Iran and was picked up by the morality police for so called ‘improper hijab’ on the 13th, an absurd ordeal for all women in Iran and the sort of thing that was stepped up by Iran’s president Ebrahim Raisi, himself also responsible for mass repression and killings of political prisoners in the 1980’s.

The veil is compulsory in Iran and millions of women face harassment, beatings, prison and being fined etc even if they are veiled but it is considered by the morality police to be ‘improper’. In April a man was shot by the morality police four times for attempting to defend his wife who was being arrested by the morality police. Mahsa Amini was severely beaten and went into a coma and died in hospital on the 16th September.  X rays revealed that she was beaten so intensely that her skull was fractured. Not just the Morality police but Raisi himself and the entire regime are directly responsible for her death.

This has rightly enraged many people in Iran, the vast majority of who do not want to live in a theocratic state in the first place and about 75% of who were not alive when the Islamic revolution happened.  The regime is run by an out of touch clique of traditionalist old religious fundamentalist men. Though Mahsa’s death is deeply sad it has been heartening to see the courage of Iranian women standing up to the regime and burning their hijabs and veils and it pleases us as anarchist communists and as human beings to see women and men of all ages uniting and defying the regime, with chants of “Women, Life and Freedom!” and “Death to the Dictator!” and calling for an end to an Islamic state. These are the largest protests and disturbances in Iran since 2009 and can be, in a sense, seen as feminist.

And thankfully it’s not just the burning of veils and the chanting of slogans, this is outright revolt – a governor’s home was set on fire in Amol, police stations have been set on fire in Mashad, posters of leaders and ideologues of the Islamic Republic have been torn down and burnt and morality police have been beaten up in Tehran, police vehicles have also been trashed and the unrest has spread widely.

We acknowledge that religion divides, rules and fools and oppresses people and that theocracy and patriarchy should not be tolerated. And even if we are realistic about the likely limitations of this revolt, we as anarchist communists, are very glad to see the Iranian people coming together to stand up and fight back against theocracy and patriarchy. We should have solidarity with this uprising in whatever way we can and we condemn the British government for its continued relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Article by Tom Hughes